RINYX vs. GSIMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RINYX (Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RINYX returned 7.16%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for GSIMX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RINYX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.

Performance

RINYX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINYX achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 6.45% return.

RINYX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 9.78%
• 1Y: 19.17%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 8.42%

GSIMX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 12.69%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINYX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RINYX Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund	7.44%	28.76%	2.93%	16.47%	-13.16%	12.88%	5.91%	20.11%	-15.25%	24.44%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	6.45%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	15.77%	27.64%	-6.04%	29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RINYX and GSIMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.79

The correlation between RINYX and GSIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RINYX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINYX

RINYX Risk / Return Rank: 23
RINYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RINYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RINYX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
RINYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
RINYX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 19
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINYX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RINYX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.27	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.78	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.56	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.28	5.22	+1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RINYX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINYX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RINYX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.27	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.63	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.82	-0.54

Drawdowns

RINYX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINYX drawdown since its inception was -61.67%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINYX and GSIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINYX	GSIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.67%	-28.84%	-32.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.97%	-7.81%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.49%	-10.32%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.04%	-25.37%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.70%	+3.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.82%	-4.82%	-10.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	2.33%	+0.61%

Volatility

RINYX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.77%. This indicates that RINYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINYX	GSIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	2.77%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.81%	7.89%	+2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.43%	9.66%	+3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.34%	14.36%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.29%	15.69%	+0.60%

RINYX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINYX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINYX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

RINYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than GSIMX's 4.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.81%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
RINYX Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund	6.84%	7.35%	3.64%	2.35%	1.45%	3.58%	1.26%	3.15%	8.95%	2.07%	2.55%	1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINYX and GSIMX in my portfolio?

RINYX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RINYX or GSIMX?

RINYX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to GSIMX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINYX dropped -61.67% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RINYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.