RINYX vs. FSGEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX).
RINYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Mar 29, 2000. FSGEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
RINYX vs. FSGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RINYX vs. FSGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINYX Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund | -1.88% | 28.76% | 2.93% | 16.47% | -13.16% | 12.88% | 5.91% | 20.11% | -15.25% | 25.22% |
FSGEX Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund | 1.75% | 32.99% | 5.34% | 15.56% | -15.75% | 7.77% | 10.75% | 21.41% | -13.99% | 27.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINYX achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than FSGEX's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RINYX has underperformed FSGEX with an annualized return of 7.84%, while FSGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.87% annualized return.
RINYX
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
FSGEX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 26.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RINYX vs. FSGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINYX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FSGEX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RINYX vs. FSGEX — Risk / Return Rank
RINYX
FSGEX
RINYX vs. FSGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RINYX | FSGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.70 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.26 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.36 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 9.13 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RINYX | FSGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.70 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.55 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.37 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between RINYX and FSGEX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RINYX vs. FSGEX - Dividend Comparison
RINYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than FSGEX's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINYX Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund | 7.49% | 7.35% | 3.64% | 2.35% | 1.45% | 3.58% | 1.26% | 3.15% | 8.95% | 2.07% | 2.55% | 1.55% |
FSGEX Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund | 2.97% | 3.02% | 2.98% | 2.90% | 2.78% | 2.59% | 1.68% | 2.10% | 2.86% | 2.48% | 2.56% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
RINYX vs. FSGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINYX drawdown since its inception was -61.67%, which is greater than FSGEX's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINYX and FSGEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINYX | FSGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.67% | -34.74% | -26.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.97% | -11.24% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.04% | -29.66% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.46% | -34.74% | -4.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.56% | -8.59% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -8.51% | -6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.90% | +0.05% |
Volatility
RINYX vs. FSGEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) is 6.59%, while Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX) has a volatility of 7.91%. This indicates that RINYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RINYX | FSGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 7.91% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 11.22% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 16.32% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 15.20% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 16.14% | +0.10% |