PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RINC vs. BBRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RINC vs. BBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RINC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBRE

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
11.77%
6M
10.56%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINC vs. BBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RINC
AXS Real Estate Income ETF
0.00%7.75%-5.74%1.71%
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
11.77%2.09%8.24%9.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RINC and BBRE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between RINC and BBRE has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RINC vs. BBRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RINC
BBRE

Real Estate

100.0%
98.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

RINC
100.0%
BBRE
98.9%

Basic Materials

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Communication Services

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Consumer Cyclical

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Consumer Defensive

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Energy

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Financial Services

RINC

-

BBRE
0.1%

Healthcare

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Industrials

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Technology

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Utilities

RINC

-

BBRE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RINC vs. BBRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINC

BBRE
BBRE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINC vs. BBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RINC vs. BBRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RINCBBREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

Drawdowns

RINC vs. BBRE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RINCBBREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

Volatility

RINC vs. BBRE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RINCBBREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

RINC vs. BBRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

RINC vs. BBRE - Dividend Comparison

RINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than BBRE's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
2.81%3.24%3.19%3.68%2.62%1.70%3.17%2.19%1.96%
RINC
AXS Real Estate Income ETF
2.16%6.04%10.85%3.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RINC and BBRE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RINC.

BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.16% for RINC.

RINC tracks Gapstow Real Estate Income Index, while BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: AXS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RINC and 0.11% for BBRE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RINC and BBRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer