PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO).

RIDH.TO and RCD.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIDH.TO is an actively managed fund by RBC. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014. RCD.TO is managed by RBC.

Performance

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF		7.03%31.43%17.07%25.01%-2.03%24.91%-3.01%25.66%-5.74%12.88%
RCD.TO
RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF		5.56%21.74%10.79%10.31%-3.37%27.62%-1.89%21.59%-11.38%5.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIDH.TO achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than RCD.TO's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RIDH.TO has outperformed RCD.TO with an annualized return of 14.51%, while RCD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.46% annualized return.

RIDH.TO

1D
2.37%
1M
-3.86%
YTD
7.03%
6M
16.45%
1Y
30.99%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
14.51%

RCD.TO

1D
2.11%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
5.56%
6M
2.79%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF

RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF

Often compared with RIDH.TO:
RIDH.TO vs. FCIL.NEORIDH.TO vs. TILV.TORIDH.TO vs. FCRI.TORIDH.TO vs. RPF.TORIDH.TO vs. QDX.TORIDH.TO vs. XDSR.TORIDH.TO vs. RBNK.TO
Often compared with RCD.TO:
RCD.TO vs. VDY.TORCD.TO vs. ZLB.TORCD.TO vs. XMV.TORCD.TO vs. XEI.TORCD.TO vs. DMEC.TORCD.TO vs. XDIV.TORCD.TO vs. XUS.TO

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIDH.TO has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than RCD.TO's 0.43% expense ratio.

RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF
RCD.TO
RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RIDH.TO
RIDH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIDH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
RCD.TO
RCD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RCD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RCD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) and RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RIDH.TORCD.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

1.62

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

1.90

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.45

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.94

8.30

+3.64

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIDH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the RCD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIDH.TO and RCD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RIDH.TORCD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.62

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.32

0.89

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.66

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.52

+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between RIDH.TO and RCD.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO - Dividend Comparison

RIDH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, which matches RCD.TO's 3.05% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIDH.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF		3.05%3.12%7.51%9.53%6.85%7.07%4.73%9.16%8.80%5.59%10.87%17.06%
RCD.TO
RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF		3.05%3.07%3.17%3.39%3.36%2.34%3.45%3.12%3.64%3.01%3.08%3.62%

Drawdowns

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIDH.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum RCD.TO drawdown of -38.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIDH.TO and RCD.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RIDH.TORCD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-38.07%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-10.15%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.33%

-16.68%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.34%

-38.07%

+3.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-4.33%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-5.48%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.00%

-0.46%

Volatility

RIDH.TO vs. RCD.TO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders (CAD Hedged) ETF (RIDH.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to RBC Quant Canadian Dividend Leaders ETF (RCD.TO) at 4.99%. This indicates that RIDH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RIDH.TORCD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

4.99%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.86%

12.70%

-3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

14.88%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.44%

13.22%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

14.47%

+1.40%