PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RID.TO vs. RPD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

RID.TO (RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD) and RPD.TO (RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RID.TO is a International Equity fund actively managed by RBC, while RPD.TO is a Europe Equities fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RID.TO returned 10.01%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for RPD.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD (RID.TO) and RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders ETF (RPD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RID.TO having a 16.07% return and RPD.TO slightly higher at 16.20%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RID.TO having a 10.01% annualized return and RPD.TO not far behind at 9.99%.

RID.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
0.58%
6M
10.88%
YTD
16.07%
1Y
32.72%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
10.01%

RPD.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.42%
6M
11.45%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
33.74%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RID.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD		16.07%33.82%13.48%16.19%-10.04%12.26%0.73%10.85%-4.90%11.39%
RPD.TO
RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders ETF		16.20%39.81%9.01%20.93%-10.71%17.45%-1.87%10.32%-9.50%11.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RID.TO and RPD.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014

0.51

Over the past year, RID.TO and RPD.TO have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD

RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RID.TO
RID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
RPD.TO
RPD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RPD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RPD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD (RID.TO) and RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders ETF (RPD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RID.TORPD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.20
2.42

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.03
3.44

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.58

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

13.68

-0.24

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RID.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the RPD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RID.TO and RPD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RID.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, smaller than the maximum RPD.TO drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RID.TO and RPD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RID.TORPD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.74%

-34.70%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-9.48%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.23%

-13.77%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.88%

-26.48%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-34.70%

+5.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.50%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-6.09%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.47%

-0.03%

Volatility

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO - Volatility Comparison

RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD (RID.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders ETF (RPD.TO) at 3.21%. This indicates that RID.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RID.TORPD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.21%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

11.77%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.95%

14.03%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

14.78%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

15.54%

-0.56%

Dividends

RID.TO vs. RPD.TO - Dividend Comparison

RID.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, which matches RPD.TO's 2.85% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RID.TO
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF CAD		2.84%3.03%3.52%3.76%4.09%2.65%3.54%4.14%4.57%3.00%3.35%3.22%
RPD.TO
RBC Quant European Dividend Leaders ETF		2.85%2.97%3.46%3.47%3.63%2.37%3.14%5.53%5.54%3.01%3.63%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

RID.TO and RPD.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RID.TO is categorized as International Equity, while RPD.TO is Europe Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RID.TO and RPD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer