PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTIW vs. NVDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTIW vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigetti Computing Inc. Warrants (RGTIW) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTIW achieves a -7.77% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's 11.59% return.


RGTIW

1D
-1.01%
1M
-32.47%
YTD
-7.77%
6M
-34.07%
1Y
156.77%
3Y*
335.54%
5Y*
57.04%
10Y*

NVDL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-8.03%
YTD
11.59%
6M
14.62%
1Y
67.28%
3Y*
98.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTIW vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RGTIW
Rigetti Computing Inc. Warrants
-7.77%75.21%4,596.30%66.66%-39.82%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
11.59%32.57%344.58%432.18%-28.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTIW and NVDL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTIW vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTIW
RGTIW Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RGTIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTIW Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTIW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTIW vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc. Warrants (RGTIW) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGTIWNVDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.60

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

3.53

-0.97

RGTIW vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTIW Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTIW and NVDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTIW vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTIW drawdown since its inception was -98.81%, which is greater than NVDL's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTIW and NVDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTIWNVDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.81%

-67.55%

-31.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.67%

-42.23%

-47.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.67%

-67.55%

-22.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.15%

-23.90%

-53.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.06%

-17.05%

-53.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.57%

19.13%

+42.44%

Volatility

RGTIW vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison

Rigetti Computing Inc. Warrants (RGTIW) has a higher volatility of 72.13% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) at 25.27%. This indicates that RGTIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTIWNVDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

72.13%

25.27%

+46.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

119.50%

52.98%

+66.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

174.85%

70.28%

+104.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

198.63%

90.35%

+108.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

196.08%

90.35%

+105.73%

Dividends

RGTIW vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGTIW nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%
RGTIW
Rigetti Computing Inc. Warrants
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTIW and NVDL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTIW has higher volatility (72.13%) compared to NVDL (25.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTIW dropped -98.81% vs NVDL's -67.55%.

NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTIW and NVDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer