RGIYX vs. RFAYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX).
RGIYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Sep 29, 2010. RFAYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Mar 29, 2000.
Performance
RGIYX vs. RFAYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGIYX vs. RFAYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.17% | 20.07% | 9.96% | 6.94% | -2.95% | 12.44% | -3.37% | 27.98% | -9.87% | 18.96% |
RFAYX Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.40% | 7.47% | 1.57% | 4.85% | -14.80% | -1.09% | 9.10% | 9.03% | -0.56% | 3.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGIYX achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than RFAYX's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, RGIYX has outperformed RFAYX with an annualized return of 8.38%, while RFAYX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.62% annualized return.
RGIYX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 21.42%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
RFAYX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGIYX vs. RFAYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGIYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RFAYX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGIYX vs. RFAYX — Risk / Return Rank
RGIYX
RFAYX
RGIYX vs. RFAYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGIYX | RFAYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 1.04 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 1.49 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.18 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.74 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 5.27 | +7.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGIYX | RFAYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.04 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | -0.03 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.33 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.75 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGIYX and RFAYX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RGIYX vs. RFAYX - Dividend Comparison
RGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than RFAYX's 5.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.68% | 9.39% | 5.64% | 2.76% | 3.46% | 17.26% | 7.80% | 15.89% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 6.70% | 5.67% |
RFAYX Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund | 5.35% | 5.19% | 4.74% | 3.71% | 1.25% | 2.50% | 5.27% | 3.46% | 2.67% | 1.57% | 5.45% | 4.09% |
Drawdowns
RGIYX vs. RFAYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGIYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than RFAYX's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGIYX and RFAYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGIYX | RFAYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -19.61% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -2.82% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.19% | -19.61% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.17% | -19.61% | -19.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -4.74% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -2.97% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 0.93% | +0.82% |
Volatility
RGIYX vs. RFAYX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) at 1.43%. This indicates that RGIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFAYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGIYX | RFAYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 1.43% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.94% | 2.36% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 4.13% | +7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 5.88% | +7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 4.89% | +11.01% |