RGEF vs. VXUS
RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. RGEF is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past year, RGEF returned 31.08% vs 32.01% for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RGEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
RGEF vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RGEF having a 13.96% return and VXUS slightly higher at 14.25%.
RGEF
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
RGEF vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 13.96% | 25.37% | -1.25% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | -4.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGEF and VXUS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between RGEF and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGEF vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
RGEF
VXUS
RGEF vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGEF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 2.85 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.03 | 11.14 | +2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGEF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.12 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.39 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
RGEF vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGEF drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEF and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGEF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -35.97% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -11.27% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.99% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -8.22% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.88% | -0.66% |
Volatility
RGEF vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) is 4.22%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that RGEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGEF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 5.60% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 13.00% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.77% | 15.21% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 16.05% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 17.16% | -0.36% |
RGEF vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGEF vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
RGEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 0.88% | 0.92% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGEF and VXUS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to RGEF (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGEF dropped -16.01% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 1-year performance, VXUS leads with 32.01% vs 31.08% for RGEF. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, RGEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 32.01% return vs 31.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RGEF.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.88% for RGEF.
They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RGEF and 0.05% for VXUS.
RGEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGEF and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer