RGEF vs. VEGA
RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) and VEGA (AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RGEF returned 31.08% vs 18.86% for VEGA. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RGEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for VEGA.
Performance
RGEF vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGEF achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than VEGA's 7.10% return.
RGEF
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEGA
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 7.10%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 18.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
RGEF vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 13.96% | 25.37% | -1.25% |
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | 7.10% | 15.83% | -0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGEF and VEGA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between RGEF and VEGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGEF vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank
RGEF
VEGA
RGEF vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGEF | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 2.76 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.03 | 12.41 | +1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGEF | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.09 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.53 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
RGEF vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGEF drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum VEGA drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEF and VEGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGEF | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -28.37% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -6.86% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.52% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -3.79% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.52% | +0.70% |
Volatility
RGEF vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) at 2.71%. This indicates that RGEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGEF | VEGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 2.71% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 7.45% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.77% | 9.06% | +4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 12.29% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 12.70% | +4.10% |
RGEF vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGEF vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison
RGEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VEGA's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 0.88% | 0.92% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | 1.25% | 1.34% | 1.05% | 1.12% | 1.89% | 0.55% | 0.28% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGEF and VEGA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGEF has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to VEGA (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGEF dropped -16.01% vs VEGA's -28.37%.
On 1-year performance, RGEF leads with 31.08% vs 18.86% for VEGA. On fees, RGEF is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RGEF has performed better with a 31.08% return vs 18.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RGEF is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.
VEGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.88% for RGEF.
They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RGEF and 2.02% for VEGA.
RGEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGEF and VEGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer