RGEF vs. FIXT
RGEF (Rockefeller Global Equity ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. RGEF is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. Over the past year, RGEF returned 26.35% vs 4.93% for FIXT. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGEF charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.
Performance
RGEF vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGEF achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 1.19% return.
RGEF
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 26.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIXT
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGEF vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 11.94% | 14.82% |
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF | 1.19% | 4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGEF and FIXT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGEF vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank
RGEF
FIXT
RGEF vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGEF | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 1.64 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 4.55 | +7.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGEF vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGEF drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEF and FIXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGEF | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -3.02% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -3.02% | -6.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | -0.94% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -0.76% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.09% | +1.20% |
Volatility
RGEF vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 1.01%. This indicates that RGEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGEF | FIXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 1.01% | +5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 2.52% | +9.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 3.76% | +11.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 3.76% | +13.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 3.76% | +13.37% |
RGEF vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGEF vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison
RGEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FIXT's 5.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF | 5.50% | 3.24% | 0.00% |
RGEF Rockefeller Global Equity ETF | 0.90% | 0.92% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGEF and FIXT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGEF has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to FIXT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGEF dropped -16.01% vs FIXT's -3.02%.
On 1-year performance, RGEF leads with 26.35% vs 4.93% for FIXT. On fees, RGEF is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RGEF has performed better with a 26.35% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RGEF is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.
FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 0.90% for RGEF.
They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RGEF and 0.75% for FIXT.
RGEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGEF and FIXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer