PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGEF vs. FIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGEF vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGEF achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 1.19% return.


RGEF

1D
0.22%
1M
0.17%
YTD
11.94%
6M
11.41%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FIXT

1D
0.48%
1M
1.55%
YTD
1.19%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGEF vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGEF and FIXT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGEF vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGEF
RGEF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RGEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RGEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FIXT
FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGEF vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGEFFIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.64

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.54

4.55

+7.00

RGEF vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the FIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGEF and FIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGEF vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGEF drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEF and FIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGEFFIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-3.02%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-3.02%

-6.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-0.94%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-0.76%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.09%

+1.20%

Volatility

RGEF vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 1.01%. This indicates that RGEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGEFFIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

1.01%

+5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

2.52%

+9.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.82%

3.76%

+11.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

3.76%

+13.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

3.76%

+13.37%

RGEF vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGEF has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGEF vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

RGEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FIXT's 5.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
5.50%3.24%0.00%
RGEF
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
0.90%0.92%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGEF and FIXT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGEF has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to FIXT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGEF dropped -16.01% vs FIXT's -3.02%.

On 1-year performance, RGEF leads with 26.35% vs 4.93% for FIXT. On fees, RGEF is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RGEF has performed better with a 26.35% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RGEF is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 0.90% for RGEF.

They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RGEF and 0.75% for FIXT.

RGEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGEF and FIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer