PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGBFX vs. AWSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGBFX vs. AWSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class R5 (RGBFX) and American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A (AWSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RGBFX having a 6.00% return and AWSHX slightly lower at 5.96%. Over the past 10 years, RGBFX has underperformed AWSHX with an annualized return of 7.24%, while AWSHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.86% annualized return.


RGBFX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.28%
YTD
6.00%
6M
6.47%
1Y
16.37%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
7.24%

AWSHX

1D
0.47%
1M
0.70%
YTD
5.96%
6M
5.54%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGBFX vs. AWSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGBFX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class R5
6.00%17.44%6.86%14.06%-14.01%9.50%10.80%17.55%-5.86%14.33%
AWSHX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A
5.96%17.20%19.02%17.21%-8.45%28.44%7.69%24.86%-6.16%20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RGBFX and AWSHX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.86

The correlation between RGBFX and AWSHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGBFX vs. AWSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGBFX
RGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

AWSHX
AWSHX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AWSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AWSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGBFX vs. AWSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class R5 (RGBFX) and American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A (AWSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGBFXAWSHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.13

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

9.17

+1.07

RGBFX vs. AWSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the AWSHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGBFX and AWSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGBFX vs. AWSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGBFX drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum AWSHX drawdown of -53.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGBFX and AWSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGBFXAWSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-53.95%

+30.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-8.37%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.76%

-14.66%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.33%

-18.64%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.31%

-34.65%

+11.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.56%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-6.41%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.94%

-0.37%

Volatility

RGBFX vs. AWSHX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class R5 (RGBFX) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A (AWSHX) at 2.94%. This indicates that RGBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGBFXAWSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

2.94%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

8.07%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

10.52%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.98%

14.11%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.48%

16.34%

-5.86%

RGBFX vs. AWSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGBFX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than AWSHX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGBFX vs. AWSHX - Dividend Comparison

RGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than AWSHX's 9.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWSHX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class A
9.77%10.08%10.06%6.14%6.31%6.05%3.06%6.19%4.36%7.26%6.37%6.25%
RGBFX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class R5
6.11%6.59%5.82%1.88%1.82%6.32%1.50%2.13%2.59%3.42%2.26%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGBFX and AWSHX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGBFX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to AWSHX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGBFX dropped -23.31% vs AWSHX's -53.95%.

RGBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGBFX and AWSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer