PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGABX vs. CCSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGABX vs. CCSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2 (RGABX) and Capital Group California Short-Term Municipal Fund (CCSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGABX achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than CCSTX's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RGABX has outperformed CCSTX with an annualized return of 14.12%, while CCSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.18% annualized return.


RGABX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-2.39%
6M
1.78%
YTD
3.82%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
14.12%
ALL TIME*
10.02%

CCSTX

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.38%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
2.26%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
1.15%
10Y*
1.18%
ALL TIME*
0.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RGABX vs. CCSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGABX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2
3.82%18.77%27.02%36.16%-31.29%18.37%36.83%27.14%-3.93%25.17%
CCSTX
Capital Group California Short-Term Municipal Fund
0.49%4.09%2.05%2.50%-2.91%-0.15%2.35%3.02%1.41%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RGABX and CCSTX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010

-0.01

The correlation between RGABX and CCSTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGABX vs. CCSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGABX
RGABX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RGABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RGABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGABX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

CCSTX
CCSTX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CCSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CCSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGABX vs. CCSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2 (RGABX) and Capital Group California Short-Term Municipal Fund (CCSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGABXCCSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.55

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

2.02

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

5.28

-2.81

RGABX vs. CCSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGABX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the CCSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGABX and CCSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGABX vs. CCSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGABX drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than CCSTX's maximum drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGABX and CCSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGABXCCSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.36%

-5.09%

-47.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-1.17%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-1.79%

-19.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.83%

-5.08%

-31.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.83%

-5.09%

-31.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-0.66%

-5.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-0.88%

-7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

0.45%

+3.33%

Volatility

RGABX vs. CCSTX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2 (RGABX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Capital Group California Short-Term Municipal Fund (CCSTX) at 0.45%. This indicates that RGABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGABXCCSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

0.45%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

0.97%

+12.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

1.21%

+15.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

1.57%

+18.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

1.58%

+18.20%

RGABX vs. CCSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGABX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSTX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGABX vs. CCSTX - Dividend Comparison

RGABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.44%, more than CCSTX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCSTX
Capital Group California Short-Term Municipal Fund
2.35%2.30%2.13%1.54%0.72%1.02%1.45%1.40%1.30%0.90%0.00%0.00%
RGABX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2
11.44%11.87%9.61%7.53%4.08%8.80%4.34%6.82%11.94%6.86%6.28%8.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGABX and CCSTX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGABX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to CCSTX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGABX dropped -52.36% vs CCSTX's -5.09%.

CCSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGABX and CCSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer