PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGABX vs. AWYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGABX vs. AWYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2 (RGABX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGABX achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than AWYIX's 3.45% return.


RGABX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-2.39%
6M
1.78%
YTD
3.82%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
14.12%
ALL TIME*
10.02%

AWYIX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.49%
6M
1.60%
YTD
3.45%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RGABX vs. AWYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RGABX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2
3.82%18.77%27.02%36.16%-31.29%18.37%36.83%27.14%-8.03%
AWYIX
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund
3.45%7.66%18.19%16.39%-15.59%29.51%12.75%35.07%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RGABX and AWYIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between RGABX and AWYIX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGABX vs. AWYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGABX
RGABX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RGABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RGABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGABX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

AWYIX
AWYIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AWYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AWYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGABX vs. AWYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2 (RGABX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGABXAWYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.12

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.79

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

2.96

-0.49

RGABX vs. AWYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGABX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the AWYIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGABX and AWYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGABX vs. AWYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGABX drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than AWYIX's maximum drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGABX and AWYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGABXAWYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.36%

-35.79%

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-8.35%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-18.72%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.83%

-19.82%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-0.43%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-4.95%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.27%

+1.51%

Volatility

RGABX vs. AWYIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2 (RGABX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX) at 2.39%. This indicates that RGABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGABXAWYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

2.39%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

7.39%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

10.15%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

14.41%

+6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

17.76%

+2.02%

RGABX vs. AWYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGABX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than AWYIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGABX vs. AWYIX - Dividend Comparison

RGABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.44%, more than AWYIX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWYIX
CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund
2.11%1.74%5.77%1.80%3.23%6.35%6.87%3.82%6.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RGABX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-2
11.44%11.87%9.61%7.53%4.08%8.80%4.34%6.82%11.94%6.86%6.28%8.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGABX and AWYIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGABX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to AWYIX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGABX dropped -52.36% vs AWYIX's -35.79%.

AWYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGABX and AWYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer