PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFVTX vs. URTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFVTX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6 (RFVTX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RFVTX having a 8.57% return and URTRX slightly lower at 8.39%.


RFVTX

1D
1.86%
1M
-1.70%
6M
5.59%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.95%

URTRX

1D
0.84%
1M
0.35%
6M
6.07%
YTD
8.39%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
7.71%
ALL TIME*
7.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RFVTX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RFVTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6
8.57%20.74%15.64%21.56%-19.63%17.34%47.06%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
8.39%14.78%8.09%13.98%-13.23%12.23%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RFVTX and URTRX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.95

The correlation between RFVTX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFVTX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RFVTX
RFVTX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RFVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RFVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

URTRX
URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RFVTX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6 (RFVTX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFVTXURTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.90

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.47

12.19

-4.73

RFVTX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFVTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFVTX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFVTX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFVTX drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, smaller than the maximum URTRX drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFVTX and URTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFVTXURTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.34%

-34.10%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-5.29%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-9.12%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-19.52%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.28%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-4.12%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.25%

+1.04%

Volatility

RFVTX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6 (RFVTX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) at 2.00%. This indicates that RFVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFVTXURTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

2.00%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

6.61%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.34%

7.81%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

9.76%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

10.31%

+4.78%

RFVTX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFVTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFVTX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

RFVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than URTRX's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFVTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6
4.30%4.67%2.80%1.99%3.96%1.54%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.25%6.78%3.16%4.24%9.53%7.66%4.53%11.43%8.54%8.10%4.06%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RFVTX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RFVTX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to URTRX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFVTX dropped -27.34% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFVTX and URTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer