PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFNGX vs. FSSKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFNGX vs. FSSKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFNGX achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly lower than FSSKX's 15.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RFNGX having a 15.45% annualized return and FSSKX not far ahead at 15.78%.


RFNGX

1D
-0.54%
1M
1.93%
YTD
14.40%
6M
14.09%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
25.52%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
15.45%

FSSKX

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.43%
YTD
15.12%
6M
14.27%
1Y
34.10%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
15.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFNGX vs. FSSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFNGX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6
14.40%24.58%22.77%26.25%-16.38%22.83%13.72%27.48%-7.09%23.15%
FSSKX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K
15.12%18.98%19.89%27.04%-19.47%23.28%25.01%32.33%-8.52%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RFNGX and FSSKX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.96

The correlation between RFNGX and FSSKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFNGX vs. FSSKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFNGX
RFNGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RFNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RFNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSKX
FSSKX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FSSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFNGX vs. FSSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFNGXFSSKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.88

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

18.22

-4.24

RFNGX vs. FSSKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFNGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FSSKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFNGX and FSSKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFNGX vs. FSSKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFNGX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, smaller than the maximum FSSKX drawdown of -53.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFNGX and FSSKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFNGXFSSKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-53.43%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-9.20%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-20.84%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.88%

-25.20%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-34.37%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.64%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-7.69%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.95%

+0.40%

Volatility

RFNGX vs. FSSKX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K (FSSKX) have volatilities of 5.60% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFNGXFSSKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

5.35%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

11.07%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

13.81%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

17.91%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

18.64%

-0.84%

RFNGX vs. FSSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFNGX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FSSKX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFNGX vs. FSSKX - Dividend Comparison

RFNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than FSSKX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSSKX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class K
4.15%4.78%4.87%2.11%0.38%1.44%5.29%6.17%4.37%3.07%1.12%5.23%
RFNGX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6
7.57%8.82%8.91%6.10%5.33%11.29%1.77%7.21%10.67%7.56%5.01%6.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RFNGX and FSSKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RFNGX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to FSSKX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFNGX dropped -33.90% vs FSSKX's -53.43%.

FSSKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFNGX and FSSKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer