RFNBX vs. FSUVX
RFNBX (American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2) and FSUVX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RFNBX returned 13.91%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for FSUVX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFNBX charges 1.36%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for FSUVX.
Performance
RFNBX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFNBX achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than FSUVX's 4.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RFNBX has outperformed FSUVX with an annualized return of 13.91%, while FSUVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.17% annualized return.
RFNBX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 32.10%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
FSUVX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- 1Y
- 12.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
RFNBX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFNBX American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2 | 14.47% | 23.22% | 21.80% | 24.89% | -17.32% | 21.49% | 12.51% | 26.09% | -8.89% | 21.82% |
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund | 4.08% | 11.03% | 17.40% | 14.80% | -10.93% | 21.51% | 9.86% | 27.73% | 1.35% | 17.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFNBX and FSUVX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RFNBX and FSUVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFNBX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank
RFNBX
FSUVX
RFNBX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2 (RFNBX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFNBX | FSUVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 1.66 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 6.96 | +6.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFNBX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFNBX drawdown since its inception was -53.81%, which is greater than FSUVX's maximum drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFNBX and FSUVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFNBX | FSUVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.81% | -32.41% | -21.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | -7.28% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | -11.55% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.53% | -19.48% | -6.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | -32.41% | -1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -2.18% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.23% | -3.27% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.73% | +0.67% |
Volatility
RFNBX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2 (RFNBX) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) at 2.68%. This indicates that RFNBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFNBX | FSUVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 2.68% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 6.53% | +5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.61% | 8.56% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 12.98% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 15.19% | +2.61% |
RFNBX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFNBX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFNBX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison
RFNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than FSUVX's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSUVX Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund | 4.28% | 4.45% | 2.25% | 1.74% | 4.12% | 3.52% | 1.31% | 3.80% | 2.63% | 2.94% | 2.23% | 1.17% |
RFNBX American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2 | 6.67% | 7.90% | 8.19% | 5.13% | 4.16% | 10.27% | 0.83% | 6.20% | 8.38% | 6.54% | 3.99% | 5.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFNBX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFNBX has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to FSUVX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFNBX dropped -53.81% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.
RFNBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFNBX and FSUVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer