RFNBX vs. FGJEX
RFNBX (American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2) and FGJEX (Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RFNBX returned 34.27% vs 24.13% for FGJEX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFNBX charges 1.36%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FGJEX.
Performance
RFNBX vs. FGJEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFNBX achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than FGJEX's 7.68% return.
RFNBX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.85%
FGJEX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 24.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFNBX vs. FGJEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RFNBX American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2 | 14.75% | 27.36% |
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z | 7.68% | 24.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFNBX and FGJEX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.86 |
The correlation between RFNBX and FGJEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFNBX vs. FGJEX — Risk / Return Rank
RFNBX
FGJEX
RFNBX vs. FGJEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2 (RFNBX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFNBX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.33 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | 3.26 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.99 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.10 | 12.54 | +2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFNBX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.33 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 2.82 | -2.22 |
Drawdowns
RFNBX vs. FGJEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFNBX drawdown since its inception was -53.81%, which is greater than FGJEX's maximum drawdown of -8.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFNBX and FGJEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFNBX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.81% | -8.32% | -45.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | -8.32% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -1.07% | -6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.98% | +0.35% |
Volatility
RFNBX vs. FGJEX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2 (RFNBX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z (FGJEX) at 2.43%. This indicates that RFNBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGJEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFNBX | FGJEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 2.43% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 7.98% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 10.67% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 10.86% | +5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 10.86% | +6.88% |
RFNBX vs. FGJEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFNBX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FGJEX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFNBX vs. FGJEX - Dividend Comparison
RFNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, less than FGJEX's 9.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGJEX Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income Fund Class Z | 9.18% | 9.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFNBX American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R2 | 6.88% | 7.90% | 8.19% | 5.13% | 4.16% | 10.27% | 0.83% | 6.20% | 8.38% | 6.54% | 3.99% | 5.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFNBX and FGJEX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFNBX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to FGJEX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFNBX dropped -53.81% vs FGJEX's -8.32%.
RFNBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFNBX and FGJEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer