RFIX vs. HYHG
RFIX (Simplify Bond Bull ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - RFIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while HYHG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. RFIX is actively managed, while HYHG is passively managed. Over the past year, RFIX returned -14.76% vs 7.32% for HYHG. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
RFIX vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFIX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly higher than HYHG's 2.90% return.
RFIX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -14.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
RFIX vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 7.97% | -28.43% | -12.32% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 2.90% | 5.31% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFIX and HYHG is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFIX vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
RFIX
HYHG
RFIX vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFIX | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.24 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 3.64 | -4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 11.96 | -12.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFIX | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 1.32 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.46 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
RFIX vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFIX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than HYHG's maximum drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIX and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFIX | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -25.71% | -13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.48% | -2.02% | -23.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.25% | -0.45% | -31.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.11% | -3.04% | -21.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 0.61% | +14.09% |
Volatility
RFIX vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) at 1.45%. This indicates that RFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFIX | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 1.45% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 4.33% | +16.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.75% | 5.56% | +24.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 8.16% | +22.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 9.15% | +21.75% |
RFIX vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RFIX and HYHG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
RFIX vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
RFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than HYHG's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.79% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 4.63% | 5.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFIX and HYHG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to HYHG (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIX dropped -38.79% vs HYHG's -25.71%.
On 1-year performance, HYHG leads with 7.32% vs -14.76% for RFIX. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, HYHG has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 7.32% return vs -14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFIX and HYHG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 4.63% for RFIX.
RFIX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while HYHG is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and ProShares.
HYHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFIX and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer