PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFHTX vs. AIVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFHTX vs. AIVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6 (RFHTX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFHTX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than AIVSX's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RFHTX has underperformed AIVSX with an annualized return of 12.23%, while AIVSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.


RFHTX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.53%
YTD
10.26%
6M
11.02%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
12.23%

AIVSX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.17%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.87%
1Y
26.68%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFHTX vs. AIVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFHTX
American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6
10.26%20.44%15.18%20.16%-18.16%17.23%19.22%24.65%-5.57%22.44%
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
10.91%20.47%24.90%28.56%-15.50%25.10%14.47%24.10%-8.21%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RFHTX and AIVSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.97

The correlation between RFHTX and AIVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFHTX vs. AIVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFHTX
RFHTX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RFHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RFHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVSX
AIVSX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AIVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFHTX vs. AIVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6 (RFHTX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFHTXAIVSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.73

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

12.38

+0.26

RFHTX vs. AIVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the AIVSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFHTX and AIVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFHTXAIVSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.21

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.94

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.86

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.70

+0.08

Drawdowns

RFHTX vs. AIVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFHTX drawdown since its inception was -28.95%, smaller than the maximum AIVSX drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFHTX and AIVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFHTXAIVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.95%

-50.90%

+21.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-10.08%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-17.40%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-24.31%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.95%

-31.09%

+2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-5.91%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.22%

-0.21%

Volatility

RFHTX vs. AIVSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6 (RFHTX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFHTXAIVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.26%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

9.72%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

12.46%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

16.00%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

16.58%

-2.00%

RFHTX vs. AIVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFHTX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than AIVSX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFHTX vs. AIVSX - Dividend Comparison

RFHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, less than AIVSX's 9.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
9.58%10.60%9.29%4.96%6.12%6.94%1.65%6.15%9.61%7.08%5.48%8.95%
RFHTX
American Funds 2045 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R-6
5.54%6.10%3.67%2.75%7.05%4.89%3.45%4.52%5.18%2.60%3.78%5.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, RFHTX and AIVSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AIVSX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to RFHTX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFHTX dropped -28.95% vs AIVSX's -50.90%.

RFHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFHTX and AIVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer