PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFGTX vs. PPLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFGTX vs. PPLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6 (RFGTX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RFGTX having a 9.16% return and PPLIX slightly higher at 9.45%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RFGTX having a 11.86% annualized return and PPLIX not far behind at 11.60%.


RFGTX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.95%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.80%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
11.86%

PPLIX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.65%
YTD
9.45%
6M
9.80%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFGTX vs. PPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFGTX
American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6
9.16%19.52%14.80%19.33%-17.53%16.88%18.79%24.37%-5.51%21.98%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.45%17.55%19.12%20.36%-18.78%17.04%16.56%26.67%-8.74%22.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RFGTX and PPLIX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.97

The correlation between RFGTX and PPLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFGTX vs. PPLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFGTX
RFGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RFGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RFGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PPLIX
PPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFGTX vs. PPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6 (RFGTX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFGTXPPLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.68

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.62

12.05

+0.57

RFGTX vs. PPLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the PPLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFGTX and PPLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFGTXPPLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.99

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.62

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.75

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.46

+0.33

Drawdowns

RFGTX vs. PPLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFGTX drawdown since its inception was -28.52%, smaller than the maximum PPLIX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFGTX and PPLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFGTXPPLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.52%

-55.61%

+27.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-8.57%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-15.59%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.85%

-26.85%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.52%

-32.67%

+4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-8.30%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.90%

-0.05%

Volatility

RFGTX vs. PPLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6 (RFGTX) is 2.98%, while Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that RFGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFGTXPPLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

3.25%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

9.22%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

11.56%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

15.47%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.10%

15.59%

-1.49%

RFGTX vs. PPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFGTX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFGTX vs. PPLIX - Dividend Comparison

RFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than PPLIX's 9.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.09%9.95%11.56%4.41%9.40%8.04%5.23%7.16%8.64%5.12%4.82%6.07%
RFGTX
American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6
5.70%6.22%3.80%2.81%6.71%5.22%3.53%4.59%5.29%2.70%3.88%5.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RFGTX and PPLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PPLIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to RFGTX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFGTX dropped -28.52% vs PPLIX's -55.61%.

RFGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFGTX and PPLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer