PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFGTX vs. AMCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFGTX vs. AMCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6 (RFGTX) and American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A (AMCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFGTX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than AMCPX's 5.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RFGTX having a 11.80% annualized return and AMCPX not far ahead at 12.27%.


RFGTX

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.87%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.19%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
11.80%

AMCPX

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.32%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.10%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFGTX vs. AMCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFGTX
American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6
8.60%19.52%14.80%19.33%-17.53%16.88%18.79%24.37%-5.51%21.98%
AMCPX
American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A
5.43%17.68%21.11%31.04%-28.67%20.57%21.42%26.35%-4.42%22.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RFGTX and AMCPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.96

The correlation between RFGTX and AMCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFGTX vs. AMCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFGTX
RFGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RFGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RFGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AMCPX
AMCPX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AMCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
AMCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFGTX vs. AMCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6 (RFGTX) and American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A (AMCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFGTXAMCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.47

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

5.98

+6.11

RFGTX vs. AMCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the AMCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFGTX and AMCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFGTXAMCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.43

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.47

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.66

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.59

+0.19

Drawdowns

RFGTX vs. AMCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFGTX drawdown since its inception was -28.52%, smaller than the maximum AMCPX drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFGTX and AMCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFGTXAMCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.52%

-62.37%

+33.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-14.18%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-19.71%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.85%

-36.90%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.52%

-36.90%

+8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-1.62%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-9.58%

+5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

3.49%

-1.64%

Volatility

RFGTX vs. AMCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6 (RFGTX) is 3.05%, while American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A (AMCPX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that RFGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFGTXAMCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.70%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

11.42%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

14.59%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

19.24%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.09%

18.72%

-4.63%

RFGTX vs. AMCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFGTX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than AMCPX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFGTX vs. AMCPX - Dividend Comparison

RFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, less than AMCPX's 8.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMCPX
American Funds AMCAP Fund Class A
8.28%8.73%8.19%3.26%7.54%3.43%3.88%4.90%7.84%5.37%3.81%8.86%
RFGTX
American Funds 2040 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6
5.72%6.22%3.80%2.81%6.71%5.22%3.53%4.59%5.29%2.70%3.88%5.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RFGTX and AMCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMCPX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to RFGTX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFGTX dropped -28.52% vs AMCPX's -62.37%.

RFGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFGTX and AMCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer