PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFEU vs. FSZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFEU vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEU achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FSZ's 2.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RFEU has underperformed FSZ with an annualized return of 8.10%, while FSZ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.


RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.83%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
8.10%

FSZ

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.06%
YTD
2.53%
6M
1.73%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEU vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%26.58%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEU and FSZ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2016

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between RFEU and FSZ has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFEU vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFEU
FSZ

Financial Services

18.9%
22.0%

Industrials

15.4%
17.1%

Healthcare

13.3%
14.6%

Technology

12.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
4.9%

Energy

8.7%

-

Utilities

6.4%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.2%
9.8%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Financial Services

RFEU
18.9%
FSZ
22.0%

Industrials

RFEU
15.4%
FSZ
17.1%

Healthcare

RFEU
13.3%
FSZ
14.6%

Technology

RFEU
12.5%
FSZ
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RFEU
10.6%
FSZ
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

RFEU
9.3%
FSZ
4.9%

Energy

RFEU
8.7%
FSZ

-

Utilities

RFEU
6.4%
FSZ
2.4%

Communication Services

RFEU
3.8%
FSZ
2.4%

Basic Materials

RFEU
1.2%
FSZ
9.8%

Real Estate

RFEU

-

FSZ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFEU vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEU vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFEUFSZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.14

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.07

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

2.61

+8.65

RFEU vs. FSZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the FSZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEU and FSZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFEU vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEU drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, which is greater than FSZ's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEU and FSZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFEUFSZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-33.97%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-10.39%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-13.93%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.92%

-33.96%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

-33.97%

-5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-4.66%

+4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-6.98%

-2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

4.24%

-2.89%

Volatility

RFEU vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) is 0.00%, while First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that RFEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFEUFSZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.07%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.51%

11.05%

-7.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.39%

14.34%

-5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

19.35%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.53%

18.75%

-1.22%

RFEU vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEU has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFEU vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison

RFEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than FSZ's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.38%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
2.83%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFEU and FSZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSZ has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEU dropped -39.74% vs FSZ's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 10.25% vs 8.10% for RFEU. On fees, FSZ is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSZ is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

RFEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.38% for FSZ.

Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFEU and 0.80% for FSZ.

RFEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFEU and FSZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer