PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFEU vs. FLGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFEU vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEU achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FLGB's 6.10% return.


RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
6M
3.95%
1Y
13.25%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
7.23%

FLGB

1D
1.10%
1M
0.70%
YTD
6.10%
6M
9.49%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEU vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%0.11%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
6.10%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEU and FLGB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between RFEU and FLGB has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFEU vs. FLGB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFEU
FLGB

Financial Services

18.9%
24.2%

Industrials

15.4%
14.2%

Healthcare

13.3%
13.6%

Technology

12.5%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
14.0%

Energy

8.7%
11.8%

Utilities

6.4%
5.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.2%
8.6%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Financial Services

RFEU
18.9%
FLGB
24.2%

Industrials

RFEU
15.4%
FLGB
14.2%

Healthcare

RFEU
13.3%
FLGB
13.6%

Technology

RFEU
12.5%
FLGB
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

RFEU
10.6%
FLGB
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

RFEU
9.3%
FLGB
14.0%

Energy

RFEU
8.7%
FLGB
11.8%

Utilities

RFEU
6.4%
FLGB
5.3%

Communication Services

RFEU
3.8%
FLGB
2.6%

Basic Materials

RFEU
1.2%
FLGB
8.6%

Real Estate

RFEU

-

FLGB
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFEU vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEU vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFEUFLGBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.00

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

7.31

+3.05

RFEU vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEU and FLGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFEUFLGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.44

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.65

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.42

-0.01

Drawdowns

RFEU vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEU drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, smaller than the maximum FLGB drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEU and FLGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFEUFLGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-42.61%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-10.26%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-13.13%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.92%

-25.90%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-3.81%

+3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-6.69%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

2.80%

-1.45%

Volatility

RFEU vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) is 0.00%, while Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that RFEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFEUFLGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

5.60%

-5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

12.10%

-7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.68%

14.21%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.63%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

18.97%

-1.12%

RFEU vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEU has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFEU vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

RFEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than FLGB's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
3.29%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
2.83%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFEU and FLGB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGB has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEU dropped -39.74% vs FLGB's -42.61%.

On 5-year performance, FLGB leads with 10.79% vs 3.74% for RFEU. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGB has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

FLGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.83% for RFEU.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFEU and 0.09% for FLGB.

RFEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFEU and FLGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer