PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFEU vs. EWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFEU vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEU achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than EWP's 6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, RFEU has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 7.29%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.


RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
6M
4.64%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
7.29%

EWP

1D
0.02%
1M
1.54%
YTD
6.62%
6M
12.03%
1Y
34.29%
3Y*
31.36%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
11.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEU vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%26.58%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
6.62%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEU and EWP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2016

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between RFEU and EWP has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFEU vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFEU
EWP

Financial Services

18.9%
41.4%

Industrials

15.4%
16.1%

Healthcare

13.3%
1.3%

Technology

12.5%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%

-

Energy

8.7%
5.3%

Utilities

6.4%
21.2%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Financial Services

RFEU
18.9%
EWP
41.4%

Industrials

RFEU
15.4%
EWP
16.1%

Healthcare

RFEU
13.3%
EWP
1.3%

Technology

RFEU
12.5%
EWP
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RFEU
10.6%
EWP
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

RFEU
9.3%
EWP

-

Energy

RFEU
8.7%
EWP
5.3%

Utilities

RFEU
6.4%
EWP
21.2%

Communication Services

RFEU
3.8%
EWP
2.9%

Basic Materials

RFEU
1.2%
EWP

-

Real Estate

RFEU

-

EWP
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFEU vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEU vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFEUEWPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.84

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

2.48

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

3.18

+0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.96

11.33

+2.64

RFEU vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEU and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFEUEWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.84

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.85

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.50

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.31

+0.10

Drawdowns

RFEU vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEU drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEU and EWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFEUEWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-61.19%

+21.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-11.38%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-12.19%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.92%

-33.91%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

-46.36%

+6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.56%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-21.44%

+11.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

3.19%

-1.84%

Volatility

RFEU vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) is 0.00%, while iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that RFEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFEUEWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

6.86%

-6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.44%

15.60%

-11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.77%

18.76%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

20.24%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

22.23%

-4.37%

RFEU vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEU has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFEU vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

RFEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than EWP's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.13%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
2.83%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFEU and EWP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEU dropped -39.74% vs EWP's -61.19%.

On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 11.11% vs 7.29% for RFEU. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

RFEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.13% for EWP.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFEU and 0.50% for EWP.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFEU and EWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer