RFAYX vs. PCGTX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RFAYX (Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund) and PCGTX (PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, RFAYX returned 1.34%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for PCGTX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RFAYX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for PCGTX.

Performance

RFAYX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFAYX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 1.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RFAYX having a 1.34% annualized return and PCGTX not far ahead at 1.37%.

RFAYX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.94%
• 6M: -0.50%
• YTD: -0.39%
• 1Y: 1.92%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: -0.96%
• 10Y*: 1.34%
• ALL TIME*: 3.26%

PCGTX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: 1.66%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 4.89%
• 5Y*: -0.05%
• 10Y*: 1.37%
• ALL TIME*: 3.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RFAYX Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RFAYX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFAYX Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund	-0.39%	7.47%	1.57%	4.85%	-14.80%	-1.09%	9.10%	9.03%	-0.56%	3.57%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	1.84%	7.84%	0.98%	5.12%	-13.48%	-0.61%	5.75%	6.55%	0.17%	2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RFAYX and PCGTX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001	0.84

The correlation between RFAYX and PCGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RFAYX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RFAYX

RFAYX Risk / Return Rank: 13
RFAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RFAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RFAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RFAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
RFAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

PCGTX

PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 43
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RFAYX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFAYX	PCGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	1.23	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	2.08	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.26	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	2.25	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.86	6.10	-4.24

RFAYX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFAYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFAYX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFAYX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFAYX drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFAYX and PCGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFAYX	PCGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-19.34%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.73%	-3.09%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.18%	-6.80%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.50%	-19.19%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.61%	-19.34%	-0.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.73%	-2.44%	-2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-1.85%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	1.11%	-0.01%

Volatility

RFAYX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) is 1.03%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that RFAYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFAYX	PCGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	1.58%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	4.77%	-2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	5.67%	-2.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.90%	7.22%	-1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.91%	5.43%	-0.52%

RFAYX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFAYX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFAYX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

RFAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than PCGTX's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	4.23%	3.78%	5.36%	5.02%	3.67%	2.87%	3.23%	3.53%	3.34%	2.96%	2.71%	2.21%
RFAYX Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund	5.13%	5.19%	4.74%	3.71%	1.25%	2.50%	5.27%	3.46%	2.67%	1.57%	5.45%	4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFAYX and PCGTX in my portfolio?

RFAYX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFAYX or PCGTX?

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to RFAYX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFAYX dropped -19.61% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.