PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REUYX vs. RFAYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REUYX vs. RFAYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sustainable Equity Fund (REUYX) and Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REUYX achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than RFAYX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, REUYX has outperformed RFAYX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while RFAYX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.59% annualized return.


REUYX

1D
0.15%
1M
5.98%
YTD
7.67%
6M
7.98%
1Y
19.00%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
13.28%

RFAYX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.29%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
1.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REUYX vs. RFAYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REUYX
Sustainable Equity Fund
7.67%12.11%15.42%19.76%-13.87%25.43%13.60%30.51%-2.60%18.45%
RFAYX
Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.38%7.47%1.57%4.85%-14.80%-1.09%9.10%9.03%-0.56%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between REUYX and RFAYX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

-0.14

The correlation between REUYX and RFAYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REUYX vs. RFAYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REUYX
REUYX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
REUYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REUYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
REUYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
REUYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
REUYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

RFAYX
RFAYX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RFAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RFAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REUYX vs. RFAYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sustainable Equity Fund (REUYX) and Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REUYXRFAYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.99

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

5.96

+2.37

REUYX vs. RFAYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REUYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the RFAYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REUYX and RFAYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REUYXRFAYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.49

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

-0.05

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.33

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.75

-0.33

Drawdowns

REUYX vs. RFAYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REUYX drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, which is greater than RFAYX's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REUYX and RFAYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REUYXRFAYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.33%

-19.61%

-36.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-2.73%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.10%

-6.32%

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.10%

-19.61%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.54%

-19.61%

-10.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.00%

+4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-2.98%

-6.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

0.91%

+1.46%

Volatility

REUYX vs. RFAYX - Volatility Comparison

Sustainable Equity Fund (REUYX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) at 1.29%. This indicates that REUYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFAYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REUYXRFAYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

1.29%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

2.55%

+6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.75%

3.65%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

5.90%

+12.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

4.90%

+12.91%

REUYX vs. RFAYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REUYX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than RFAYX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

REUYX vs. RFAYX - Dividend Comparison

REUYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, more than RFAYX's 5.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REUYX
Sustainable Equity Fund
13.01%14.26%13.92%7.38%12.93%23.27%16.46%14.74%9.95%10.43%16.25%1.49%
RFAYX
Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund
5.43%5.19%4.74%3.71%1.25%2.50%5.27%3.46%2.67%1.57%5.45%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


REUYX and RFAYX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REUYX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to RFAYX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REUYX dropped -56.33% vs RFAYX's -19.61%.

REUYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REUYX and RFAYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer