PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RESGX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RESGX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RESGX achieves a 23.30% return, which is significantly higher than VITPX's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RESGX has underperformed VITPX with an annualized return of 12.18%, while VITPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.


RESGX

1D
0.92%
1M
0.46%
6M
16.23%
YTD
23.30%
1Y
34.28%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
12.18%
ALL TIME*
12.67%

VITPX

1D
1.53%
1M
1.32%
6M
10.66%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
14.71%
ALL TIME*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RESGX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
23.30%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
12.19%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RESGX and VITPX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.92

The correlation between RESGX and VITPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RESGX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RESGX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RESGXVITPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

2.67

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

11.54

+2.98

RESGX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RESGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RESGX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RESGX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RESGX drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, smaller than the maximum VITPX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESGX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RESGXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.80%

-55.28%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-8.92%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.50%

-19.35%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-25.31%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

-34.99%

-2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

0.00%

-3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-7.98%

+3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.06%

+0.44%

Volatility

RESGX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) is 3.53%, while Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that RESGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RESGXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.78%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

10.36%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

13.12%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

17.47%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

18.42%

+0.24%

RESGX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RESGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

RESGX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

RESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than VITPX's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.91%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.28%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


RESGX and VITPX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VITPX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to RESGX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RESGX dropped -37.80% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RESGX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer