RESGX vs. IICAX
RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) and IICAX (Asset Management Fund Large Cap Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RESGX returned 13.23%/yr vs 11.69%/yr for IICAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RESGX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for IICAX.
Performance
RESGX vs. IICAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RESGX achieves a 24.62% return, which is significantly higher than IICAX's 7.72% return. Over the past 10 years, RESGX has outperformed IICAX with an annualized return of 13.23%, while IICAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.69% annualized return.
RESGX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 24.62%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 40.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
IICAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
RESGX vs. IICAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio | 24.62% | 10.30% | 11.40% | 15.59% | -14.71% | 26.58% | 9.57% | 24.25% | -6.47% | 22.82% |
IICAX Asset Management Fund Large Cap Equity Fund | 7.72% | 12.59% | 18.66% | 21.70% | -12.87% | 33.00% | 11.90% | 26.48% | -6.25% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RESGX and IICAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RESGX and IICAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RESGX vs. IICAX — Risk / Return Rank
RESGX
IICAX
RESGX vs. IICAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) and Asset Management Fund Large Cap Equity Fund (IICAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RESGX | IICAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.33 | 3.03 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.84 | 13.04 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RESGX vs. IICAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RESGX drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, smaller than the maximum IICAX drawdown of -96.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESGX and IICAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RESGX | IICAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.80% | -96.26% | +58.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.84% | -7.25% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -17.69% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.58% | -22.79% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.80% | -39.01% | +1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -67.77% | +65.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -68.17% | +63.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 1.68% | +0.53% |
Volatility
RESGX vs. IICAX - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Asset Management Fund Large Cap Equity Fund (IICAX) at 3.40%. This indicates that RESGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IICAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RESGX | IICAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 3.40% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 8.36% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 10.74% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.96% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 21.93% | -3.18% |
RESGX vs. IICAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RESGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than IICAX's 1.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
RESGX vs. IICAX - Dividend Comparison
RESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than IICAX's 10.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IICAX Asset Management Fund Large Cap Equity Fund | 10.44% | 11.22% | 6.32% | 9.33% | 9.58% | 5.38% | 3.83% | 5.15% | 13.41% | 0.85% | 30.91% | 8.23% |
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio | 6.68% | 8.24% | 13.38% | 9.08% | 8.17% | 9.98% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 5.09% | 0.94% | 0.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RESGX and IICAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RESGX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to IICAX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RESGX dropped -37.80% vs IICAX's -96.26%.
RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RESGX and IICAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer