PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RESGX vs. GABEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RESGX vs. GABEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) and Gabelli Equity Income Fund (GABEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RESGX achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly higher than GABEX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RESGX has outperformed GABEX with an annualized return of 13.16%, while GABEX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.74% annualized return.


RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%

GABEX

1D
0.98%
1M
1.95%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.91%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RESGX vs. GABEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%
GABEX
Gabelli Equity Income Fund
7.33%4.33%6.62%8.25%-5.22%23.28%7.54%75.11%-11.37%15.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RESGX and GABEX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.89

The correlation between RESGX and GABEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RESGX vs. GABEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GABEX
GABEX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GABEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABEX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GABEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABEX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RESGX vs. GABEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) and Gabelli Equity Income Fund (GABEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RESGXGABEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.11

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.89

0.51

+5.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.39

1.09

+20.29

RESGX vs. GABEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RESGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the GABEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RESGX and GABEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RESGXGABEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

0.44

+2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.32

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.55

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.60

+0.11

Drawdowns

RESGX vs. GABEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RESGX drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, smaller than the maximum GABEX drawdown of -52.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESGX and GABEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RESGXGABEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.80%

-52.25%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-13.11%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.50%

-14.75%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-17.59%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

-37.27%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.87%

+2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-5.16%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

6.07%

-3.92%

Volatility

RESGX vs. GABEX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Gabelli Equity Income Fund (GABEX) at 3.32%. This indicates that RESGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RESGXGABEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

3.32%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

9.05%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.41%

15.04%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

15.24%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

21.33%

-2.62%

RESGX vs. GABEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RESGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GABEX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

RESGX vs. GABEX - Dividend Comparison

RESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than GABEX's 21.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GABEX
Gabelli Equity Income Fund
21.32%20.83%33.06%23.48%20.49%19.96%32.82%65.43%31.87%17.83%16.63%7.78%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RESGX and GABEX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to GABEX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RESGX dropped -37.80% vs GABEX's -52.25%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RESGX and GABEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer