RESGX vs. AMFEX
RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) and AMFEX (AAMA Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RESGX returned 9.35%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for AMFEX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RESGX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for AMFEX.
Performance
RESGX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RESGX achieves a 23.30% return, which is significantly higher than AMFEX's 15.43% return.
RESGX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 1Y
- 34.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.67%
AMFEX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RESGX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio | 23.30% | 10.30% | 11.40% | 15.59% | -14.71% | 26.58% | 9.57% | 24.25% | -8.58% |
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 15.43% | 17.33% | 16.28% | 17.32% | -14.08% | 22.58% | 12.70% | 24.62% | -9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between RESGX and AMFEX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.91 |
The correlation between RESGX and AMFEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RESGX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank
RESGX
AMFEX
RESGX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RESGX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | 4.42 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 18.45 | -3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RESGX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RESGX drawdown since its inception was -37.80%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESGX and AMFEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RESGX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.80% | -30.41% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.84% | -6.07% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -15.23% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.58% | -21.21% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | 0.00% | -3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -4.23% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 1.45% | +1.05% |
Volatility
RESGX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 2.54%. This indicates that RESGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RESGX | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 2.54% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 7.80% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.88% | 10.03% | +4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 14.23% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 16.84% | +1.82% |
RESGX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RESGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
RESGX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison
RESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than AMFEX's 10.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 10.39% | 11.99% | 9.19% | 0.92% | 4.82% | 0.22% | 0.44% | 0.78% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio | 6.91% | 8.24% | 13.38% | 9.08% | 8.17% | 9.98% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 5.09% | 0.94% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RESGX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RESGX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to AMFEX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RESGX dropped -37.80% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.
AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RESGX and AMFEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer