RERGX vs. FSENX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RERGX (American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6) and FSENX (Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio) are both mutual funds - RERGX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by American Funds, while FSENX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, RERGX returned 9.12%/yr vs 9.79%/yr for FSENX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RERGX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FSENX.

Performance

RERGX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RERGX achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 36.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RERGX has underperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 9.12%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.79% annualized return.

RERGX

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 6M: 13.85%
• 1Y: 27.52%
• 3Y*: 16.05%
• 5Y*: 5.07%
• 10Y*: 9.12%

FSENX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 36.38%
• 6M: 32.95%
• 1Y: 56.07%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 22.18%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RERGX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RERGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6	11.44%	29.34%	3.00%	16.11%	-22.77%	2.84%	25.27%	27.40%	-17.33%	31.19%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	36.38%	10.56%	4.26%	0.94%	62.98%	55.31%	-32.51%	9.90%	-24.94%	-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between RERGX and FSENX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.52

The correlation between RERGX and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RERGX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RERGX

RERGX Risk / Return Rank: 39
RERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
RERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FSENX

FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RERGX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RERGX	FSENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.71	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.44	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.43	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	5.35	-3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.58	15.73	-7.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RERGX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RERGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RERGX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RERGX	FSENX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	2.71	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.82	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.32	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.32	+0.10

Drawdowns

RERGX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RERGX drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RERGX and FSENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RERGX	FSENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.30%	-76.24%	+38.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.52%	-9.95%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.62%	-25.85%	+10.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.30%	-28.02%	-9.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.30%	-72.11%	+34.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-4.14%	+3.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.21%	-17.01%	+7.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.38%	-0.07%

Volatility

RERGX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) is 5.52%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that RERGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RERGX	FSENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	7.62%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.93%	15.36%	-2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.39%	19.69%	-4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.67%	27.26%	-10.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.93%	30.96%	-14.03%

RERGX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RERGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

RERGX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

RERGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than FSENX's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	1.57%	1.95%	1.95%	1.98%	2.50%	2.25%	3.43%	1.84%	1.48%	1.74%	0.62%	1.29%
RERGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6	12.52%	13.95%	4.96%	3.95%	2.02%	10.19%	0.41%	3.14%	3.17%	4.99%	1.64%	3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RERGX and FSENX in my portfolio?

RERGX and FSENX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RERGX or FSENX?

FSENX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to RERGX (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RERGX dropped -37.30% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.