RENW.L vs. VPAC.L
RENW.L (L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF) and VPAC.L (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD) are both Global Equities funds - RENW.L tracks the L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF while VPAC.L tracks the Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RENW.L returned 5.60%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for VPAC.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RENW.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPAC.L.
Performance
RENW.L vs. VPAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RENW.L achieves a 23.89% return, which is significantly higher than VPAC.L's 2.04% return.
RENW.L
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.42%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 23.89%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- —
VPAC.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
RENW.L vs. VPAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RENW.L L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF | 23.89% | 51.27% | -14.25% | -8.27% | -8.82% | -7.46% | 24.52% |
VPAC.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD | 2.04% | 6.34% | 10.84% | 9.27% | -9.70% | 3.64% | 3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between RENW.L and VPAC.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2020 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RENW.L vs. VPAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
RENW.L
VPAC.L
RENW.L vs. VPAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RENW.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 2.54 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 9.98 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RENW.L vs. VPAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RENW.L drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than VPAC.L's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.L and VPAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RENW.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.58% | -34.25% | -14.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.66% | -2.02% | -13.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.48% | -3.40% | -29.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.77% | -13.89% | -29.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.34% | -0.33% | -15.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.62% | -3.14% | -20.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 0.52% | +4.02% |
Volatility
RENW.L vs. VPAC.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.L) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) at 0.74%. This indicates that RENW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RENW.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.94% | 0.74% | +8.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.76% | 2.28% | +18.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.93% | 3.17% | +22.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 5.30% | +19.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 11.00% | +13.98% |
RENW.L vs. VPAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RENW.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than VPAC.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RENW.L vs. VPAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RENW.L nor VPAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RENW.L and VPAC.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RENW.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RENW.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPAC.L.
RENW.L tracks L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF, while VPAC.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RENW.L and 0.50% for VPAC.L.
Find the right allocation for RENW.L and VPAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer