RENW.L vs. MINT.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RENW.L (L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF) and MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - RENW.L tracks the L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF while MINT.L tracks the PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RENW.L returned 5.60%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for MINT.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RENW.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RENW.L achieves a 23.89% return, which is significantly higher than MINT.L's 2.39% return.

RENW.L

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -8.42%
• 6M: 17.61%
• YTD: 23.89%
• 1Y: 47.17%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: 5.60%
• 10Y*: —

MINT.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 2.17%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 1Y: 4.58%
• 3Y*: 5.23%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 2.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RENW.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RENW.L L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF	23.89%	51.27%	-14.25%	-8.27%	-8.82%	-7.46%	24.52%
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF	2.39%	4.66%	5.75%	5.72%	-0.67%	-0.09%	0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RENW.L and MINT.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2020	0.02

Return for Risk

RENW.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RENW.L

RENW.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
RENW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
RENW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RENW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
RENW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
RENW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

MINT.L

MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RENW.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RENW.L	MINT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	7.86	-6.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	16.90	-14.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	3.57	-2.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	45.35	-42.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.60	232.26	-221.66

RENW.L vs. MINT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RENW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the MINT.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RENW.L and MINT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RENW.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RENW.L drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than MINT.L's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.L and MINT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RENW.L	MINT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.58%	-3.89%	-44.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.66%	-0.10%	-15.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.48%	-0.62%	-31.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.77%	-2.47%	-41.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-3.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.34%	0.00%	-15.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.62%	-0.23%	-23.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	0.02%	+4.52%

Volatility

RENW.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.L) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that RENW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RENW.L	MINT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.94%	0.14%	+8.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.76%	0.35%	+20.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.93%	0.58%	+25.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.75%	0.76%	+23.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.98%	0.95%	+24.03%

Dividends

RENW.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison

RENW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF	4.36%	4.43%	5.18%	4.81%	1.51%	0.34%	1.17%	2.63%	2.33%	1.56%	1.31%	0.79%
RENW.L L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RENW.L and MINT.L in my portfolio?

RENW.L and MINT.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between RENW.L and MINT.L?

RENW.L tracks L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF, while MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: L&G and PIMCO.