REMX vs. UTES
REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. REMX is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, REMX returned 9.04%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for UTES. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.
Performance
REMX vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's -1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, REMX has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 9.04%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.
REMX
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -17.82%
- YTD
- 18.26%
- 6M
- 21.26%
- 1Y
- 129.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
UTES
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- 8.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
REMX vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 18.26% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | -1.37% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX and UTES is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015 | 0.17 |
REMX vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REMX
UTES
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
REMX
UTES
-
Communication Services
REMX
-
UTES
-
Consumer Cyclical
REMX
-
UTES
-
Consumer Defensive
REMX
-
UTES
-
Energy
REMX
-
UTES
-
Financial Services
REMX
-
UTES
-
Healthcare
REMX
-
UTES
-
Industrials
REMX
-
UTES
-
Real Estate
REMX
-
UTES
-
Technology
REMX
-
UTES
-
Utilities
REMX
-
UTES
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
REMX
UTES
REMX vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REMX | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.08 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.58 | 0.58 | +5.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 1.31 | +14.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REMX | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 0.38 | +2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.74 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.60 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.69 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
REMX vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -35.39% | -54.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | -13.88% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.11% | -17.62% | -44.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.34% | -20.40% | -52.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.34% | -35.39% | -37.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.97% | -10.57% | -49.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -5.53% | -61.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.34% | 6.16% | +2.18% |
Volatility
REMX vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 14.39% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 7.30%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.39% | 7.30% | +7.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.93% | 16.99% | +18.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.92% | 21.27% | +27.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.41% | 20.61% | +19.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.04% | 20.17% | +16.87% |
REMX vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than UTES's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.49% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.52% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX and UTES have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (14.39%) compared to UTES (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs UTES's -35.39%.
On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.13% vs 9.04% for REMX. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.13% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.
UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.49% for REMX.
REMX is categorized as Materials, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.49% for UTES.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REMX and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer