REMX vs. RAVI
REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) and RAVI (FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while RAVI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by FlexShares. REMX is passively managed, while RAVI is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, REMX returned 10.56%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for RAVI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for RAVI.
Performance
REMX vs. RAVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 38.23% return, which is significantly higher than RAVI's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, REMX has outperformed RAVI with an annualized return of 10.56%, while RAVI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.67% annualized return.
REMX
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 38.23%
- 6M
- 42.20%
- 1Y
- 188.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
RAVI
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
REMX vs. RAVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 38.23% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.51% | 4.98% | 5.67% | 5.55% | 0.15% | -0.04% | 2.06% | 3.49% | 1.65% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX and RAVI is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.03 |
The correlation between REMX and RAVI shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX vs. RAVI — Risk / Return Rank
REMX
RAVI
REMX vs. RAVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REMX | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.96 | 11.04 | -7.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.88 | 23.73 | -19.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 5.40 | -3.91 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.93 | 39.12 | -31.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.90 | 228.71 | -205.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REMX | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96 | 11.04 | -7.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 2.49 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 2.09 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 2.03 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
REMX vs. RAVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than RAVI's maximum drawdown of -3.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and RAVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -3.72% | -86.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | -0.12% | -23.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.11% | -0.36% | -61.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.34% | -3.28% | -70.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.34% | -3.72% | -69.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.21% | 0.00% | -53.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.87% | -0.17% | -66.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 0.02% | +8.07% |
Volatility
REMX vs. RAVI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) at 0.15%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX | RAVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 0.15% | +12.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.60% | 0.30% | +34.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.95% | 0.41% | +47.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.21% | 1.41% | +38.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.92% | 1.28% | +35.64% |
REMX vs. RAVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RAVI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX vs. RAVI - Dividend Comparison
REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than RAVI's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAVI FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.38% | 4.59% | 5.34% | 4.55% | 1.70% | 0.90% | 1.29% | 2.53% | 2.22% | 1.28% | 0.90% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 1.27% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX and RAVI have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to RAVI (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs RAVI's -3.72%.
On 10-year performance, REMX leads with 10.56% vs 2.67% for RAVI. On fees, RAVI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RAVI has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, REMX has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 2.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RAVI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.
RAVI has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.27% for REMX.
REMX is categorized as Materials, while RAVI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.25% for RAVI.
RAVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.04 vs 3.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REMX and RAVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer