REMX vs. EWY
REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REMX returned 10.32%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for EWY. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
REMX vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 29.19% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 103.10% return. Over the past 10 years, REMX has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 10.32%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.84% annualized return.
REMX
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- 29.19%
- 6M
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- 144.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
REMX vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 29.19% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX and EWY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010 | 0.52 |
The correlation between REMX and EWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
REMX vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REMX
EWY
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
REMX
EWY
Communication Services
REMX
-
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
REMX
-
EWY
Consumer Defensive
REMX
-
EWY
Energy
REMX
-
EWY
Financial Services
REMX
-
EWY
Healthcare
REMX
-
EWY
Industrials
REMX
-
EWY
Real Estate
REMX
-
EWY
-
Technology
REMX
-
EWY
Utilities
REMX
-
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
REMX
EWY
REMX vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REMX | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.59 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 8.65 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.82 | 30.24 | -13.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REMX vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than EWY's maximum drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -74.14% | -16.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | -23.08% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.11% | -27.36% | -34.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.34% | -48.55% | -24.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.34% | -49.73% | -23.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.27% | -8.88% | -47.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.84% | -20.11% | -46.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.63% | 6.59% | +2.04% |
Volatility
REMX vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is 17.56%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that REMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.56% | 25.64% | -8.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.14% | 42.65% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.74% | 46.51% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.64% | 30.15% | +10.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.14% | 28.06% | +9.08% |
REMX vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both REMX and EWY have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
REMX vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than EWY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.36% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX and EWY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to REMX (17.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 10.32% for REMX. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, REMX has been the lower-risk option at 17.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REMX and EWY have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
REMX is categorized as Materials, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REMX and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer