PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMX vs. EART
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMX vs. EART - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 24.22% return, which is significantly higher than EART's 8.19% return.


REMX

1D
-5.62%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
24.22%
6M
22.61%
1Y
139.49%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
10.09%

EART

1D
-5.19%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
8.19%
6M
8.04%
1Y
90.35%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX vs. EART - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
24.22%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-24.19%
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
8.19%98.48%-7.19%-19.75%-17.92%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and EART is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022

0.85

The correlation between REMX and EART has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMX vs. EART — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EART
EART Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EART Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. EART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMXEARTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.01

3.49

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.83

10.10

+5.73

REMX vs. EART - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the EART Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and EART, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMX vs. EART - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than EART's maximum drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and EART.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMXEARTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-53.68%

-36.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.35%

-26.03%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.11%

-37.20%

-24.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.95%

-18.05%

-39.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.82%

-28.98%

-37.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.85%

8.98%

-0.13%

Volatility

REMX vs. EART - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 16.71% compared to Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) at 13.28%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMXEARTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.71%

13.28%

+3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.35%

33.46%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.97%

39.51%

+10.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.71%

34.26%

+6.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.16%

34.26%

+2.90%

REMX vs. EART - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both REMX and EART have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

REMX vs. EART - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than EART's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
0.60%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.42%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMX and EART have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (16.71%) compared to EART (13.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs EART's -53.68%.

On 3-year performance, EART leads with 19.97% vs 5.61% for REMX. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EART has been the lower-risk option at 13.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 19.97% return vs 5.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REMX and EART have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.60% for EART.

REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMX and EART

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer