REMX.L vs. REGB.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

REMX.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF) and REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX.L is a Commodities fund tracking the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF, while REGB.L is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, REMX.L returned -3.25%/yr vs -2.45%/yr for REGB.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

REMX.L vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF (REMX.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

REMX.L is traded in USD, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX.L achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than REGB.L's 6.60% return.

REMX.L

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -23.14%
• 6M: -17.06%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 1Y: 60.74%
• 3Y*: -3.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

REGB.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -19.13%
• 6M: -13.13%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 1Y: 68.06%
• 3Y*: -2.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX.L vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
REMX.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF	2.13%	88.79%	-35.65%	-18.38%	-30.93%	7.28%
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	6.60%	88.93%	-35.64%	-18.71%	-31.13%	-21.10%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX.L and REGB.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021	0.87

The correlation between REMX.L and REGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (3 years) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

REMX.L vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX.L

REMX.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
REMX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
REMX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
REMX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
REMX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
REMX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

REGB.L

REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX.L vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF (REMX.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REMX.L	REGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.46	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.02	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.24	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	2.30	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	6.36	-0.72

REMX.L vs. REGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the REGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX.L and REGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REMX.L vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX.L drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, roughly equal to the maximum REGB.L drawdown of -75.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX.L and REGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMX.L	REGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.21%	-75.84%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.73%	-29.76%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.69%	-60.66%	-0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.14%	-42.74%	+3.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.58%	-48.30%	+6.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.86%	10.73%	+0.13%

Volatility

REMX.L vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF (REMX.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) have volatilities of 11.26% and 11.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REMX.L	REGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.26%	11.11%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.16%	34.18%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.91%	46.90%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.71%	48.26%	+6.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.71%	48.26%	+6.45%

REMX.L vs. REGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both REMX.L and REGB.L have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

REMX.L vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither REMX.L nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REMX.L and REGB.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, REMX.L and REGB.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, REMX.L or REGB.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REMX.L or REGB.L?

REMX.L and REGB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

What is the main difference between REMX.L and REGB.L?

REMX.L is categorized as Commodities, while REGB.L is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. REMX.L tracks VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF, while REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD.