REMG vs. EMEQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

REMG (Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, REMG returned 48.86% vs 148.00% for EMEQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REMG charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

REMG vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMG achieves a 24.01% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 77.86% return.

REMG

• 1D: -5.46%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 24.01%
• 6M: 25.35%
• 1Y: 48.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMEQ

• 1D: -8.46%
• 1M: 12.67%
• YTD: 77.86%
• 6M: 84.70%
• 1Y: 148.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMG vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
REMG Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF	24.01%	24.03%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	77.86%	49.18%

Correlation

The correlation between REMG and EMEQ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025	0.89

The correlation between REMG and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

REMG vs. EMEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REMG	EMEQ
Technology	44.1%	1.1%
Financial Services	18.3%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	6.2%
Industrials	6.4%	0.3%
Basic Materials	5.6%	1.3%
Communication Services	5.4%	2.4%
Energy	3.5%	1.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	3.8%
Healthcare	2.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.5%	-
Utilities	1.1%	0.9%

Return for Risk

REMG vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMG

REMG Risk / Return Rank: 73
REMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
REMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
REMG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
REMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
REMG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 94
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMG vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REMG	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	3.98	-1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	4.00	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.61	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	8.31	-4.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.33	30.81	-17.48

REMG vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMG and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REMG vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMG drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum EMEQ drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMG and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMG	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-19.99%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.13%	-17.91%	+3.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.46%	-8.46%	+3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-4.03%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	4.82%	-1.15%

Volatility

REMG vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) is 12.25%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 21.89%. This indicates that REMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REMG	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.25%	21.89%	-9.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.88%	34.54%	-13.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.12%	37.38%	-14.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.66%	32.96%	-10.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.66%	32.96%	-10.30%

REMG vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

REMG vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

REMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than EMEQ's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.55%	2.76%	0.84%
REMG Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.11%	1.37%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REMG and EMEQ in my portfolio?

REMG and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REMG or EMEQ?

EMEQ has higher volatility (21.89%) compared to REMG (12.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMG dropped -14.13% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

Which ETF is better, REMG or EMEQ?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 148.00% vs 48.86% for REMG. On fees, REMG is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, REMG has been the lower-risk option at 12.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REMG or EMEQ?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 148.00% return vs 48.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REMG or EMEQ?

REMG is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REMG or EMEQ?

EMEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.11% for REMG.

What is the main difference between REMG and EMEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Russell and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for REMG and 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.