PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMG vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMG vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMG achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


REMG

1D
-3.88%
1M
-4.57%
6M
12.70%
YTD
19.41%
1Y
38.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMG vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between REMG and BITI is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMG vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMG
REMG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
REMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
REMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMG vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMGBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.72

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

6.78

+3.02

REMG vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMG and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMG vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMG drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMG and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMGBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-92.16%

+78.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.13%

-25.28%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-85.94%

+76.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-68.34%

+66.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

10.11%

-6.19%

Volatility

REMG vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) have volatilities of 11.05% and 11.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMGBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.05%

11.38%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.78%

34.25%

-12.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.00%

44.14%

-20.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

52.28%

-29.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

52.28%

-29.18%

REMG vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMG vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

REMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
REMG
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.15%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMG and BITI have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to REMG (11.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMG dropped -14.13% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 68.34% vs 38.29% for REMG. On fees, REMG is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, REMG has been the lower-risk option at 11.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 68.34% return vs 38.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REMG is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 1.15% for REMG.

REMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Russell and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for REMG and 1.03% for BITI.

REMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMG and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer