PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REM vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REM vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REM achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.51% return.


REM

1D
-1.24%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-2.10%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
-2.48%
10Y*
2.55%

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REM vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
-2.10%13.30%-1.00%14.43%-27.56%16.14%44.72%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.51%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between REM and SGOV is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REM vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REM
REM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
REM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
REM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
REM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REM vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-274.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

195.55

-194.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

398.20

-397.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

4,462.00

-4,459.67

REM vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REM Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REM and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMSGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

20.28

-19.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

14.73

-14.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

12.48

-12.53

Drawdowns

REM vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REM drawdown since its inception was -74.73%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REM and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.73%

-0.03%

-74.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-0.01%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-0.01%

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.31%

-0.03%

-43.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.85%

0.00%

-23.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-0.00%

-38.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

0.00%

+4.95%

Volatility

REM vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that REM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

0.05%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

0.13%

+12.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

0.20%

+16.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

0.24%

+23.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.27%

0.24%

+28.03%

REM vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

REM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

REM vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

REM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than SGOV's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
9.19%8.70%9.61%9.46%11.13%7.29%7.72%8.16%10.00%9.97%10.03%11.99%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.86%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REM and SGOV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REM has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REM dropped -74.73% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.54% vs -2.48% for REM. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.54% return vs -2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for REM.

REM has the higher dividend yield at 9.19%, compared with 3.86% for SGOV.

REM is categorized as REIT, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. REM tracks FTSE NAREIT All Mortgage Capped Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REM and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REM and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer