PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REM vs. QREARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REM vs. QREARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REM achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than QREARX's 0.95% return.


REM

1D
-1.24%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-2.10%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
-2.48%
10Y*
2.55%

QREARX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.11%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REM vs. QREARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
-2.10%10.56%
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.95%3.93%

Correlation

The correlation between REM and QREARX is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REM vs. QREARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REM
REM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
REM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
REM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
REM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

QREARX
QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REM vs. QREARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMQREARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

2.49

-1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

8.91

-8.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

32.47

-30.14

REM vs. QREARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REM Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the QREARX Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REM and QREARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMQREARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

4.27

-3.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

2.12

-2.17

Drawdowns

REM vs. QREARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REM drawdown since its inception was -74.73%, which is greater than QREARX's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REM and QREARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMQREARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.73%

-1.45%

-73.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-0.37%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.85%

-0.06%

-23.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-0.06%

-38.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

0.10%

+4.85%

Volatility

REM vs. QREARX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) at 0.12%. This indicates that REM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QREARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMQREARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

0.12%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

0.45%

+12.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

0.77%

+16.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

1.66%

+21.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.27%

1.66%

+26.61%

REM vs. QREARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than QREARX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

REM vs. QREARX - Dividend Comparison

REM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, while QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
9.19%8.70%9.61%9.46%11.13%7.29%7.72%8.16%10.00%9.97%10.03%11.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


REM and QREARX have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REM has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to QREARX (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REM dropped -74.73% vs QREARX's -1.45%.

QREARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REM and QREARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer