PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REM vs. HAUZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REM vs. HAUZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REM achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly higher than HAUZ's -2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, REM has underperformed HAUZ with an annualized return of 2.55%, while HAUZ has yielded a comparatively higher 3.62% annualized return.


REM

1D
-1.24%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-2.10%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
-2.48%
10Y*
2.55%

HAUZ

1D
-1.44%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-2.64%
6M
-1.65%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
-1.54%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REM vs. HAUZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
-2.10%13.30%-1.00%14.43%-27.56%16.14%-19.99%21.34%-3.09%18.43%
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
-2.64%22.70%-5.44%6.29%-22.24%9.82%-6.23%20.89%-9.12%27.52%

Correlation

The correlation between REM and HAUZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.44

The correlation between REM and HAUZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REM vs. HAUZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REM
HAUZ

Real Estate

97.2%
96.5%

Financial Services

2.4%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

1.3%

Technology

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Real Estate

REM
97.2%
HAUZ
96.5%

Financial Services

REM
2.4%
HAUZ
0.3%

Basic Materials

REM

-

HAUZ
0.1%

Communication Services

REM

-

HAUZ
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

REM

-

HAUZ
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

REM

-

HAUZ
0.0%

Energy

REM

-

HAUZ
0.0%

Healthcare

REM

-

HAUZ
0.0%

Industrials

REM

-

HAUZ
1.3%

Technology

REM

-

HAUZ
0.1%

Utilities

REM

-

HAUZ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REM vs. HAUZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REM
REM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
REM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
REM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
REM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

HAUZ
HAUZ Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HAUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HAUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REM vs. HAUZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMHAUZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.09

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

0.43

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

1.28

+1.05

REM vs. HAUZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REM Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the HAUZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REM and HAUZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMHAUZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.43

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

-0.10

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.21

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.17

-0.22

Drawdowns

REM vs. HAUZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REM drawdown since its inception was -74.73%, which is greater than HAUZ's maximum drawdown of -39.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REM and HAUZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMHAUZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.73%

-39.51%

-35.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-14.08%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-17.88%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.31%

-34.52%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-39.51%

-29.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.85%

-11.73%

-12.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-11.75%

-26.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

4.65%

+0.30%

Volatility

REM vs. HAUZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) is 3.81%, while Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that REM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAUZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMHAUZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

4.73%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

11.47%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

13.83%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

15.96%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.27%

16.97%

+11.30%

REM vs. HAUZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

REM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than HAUZ's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

REM vs. HAUZ - Dividend Comparison

REM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than HAUZ's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
4.58%4.46%4.50%3.50%1.99%4.84%3.37%3.69%1.93%2.59%2.18%9.42%
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
9.19%8.70%9.61%9.46%11.13%7.29%7.72%8.16%10.00%9.97%10.03%11.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


REM and HAUZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAUZ has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to REM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REM dropped -74.73% vs HAUZ's -39.51%.

On 10-year performance, HAUZ leads with 3.62% vs 2.55% for REM. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, REM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAUZ has performed better with a 3.62% return vs 2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for REM.

REM has the higher dividend yield at 9.19%, compared with 4.58% for HAUZ.

REM tracks FTSE NAREIT All Mortgage Capped Index, while HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REM and 0.10% for HAUZ.

REM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REM and HAUZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer