REK vs. SRVR
REK (ProShares Short Real Estate) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - REK tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%) while SRVR tracks the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REK returned -0.24%/yr vs -3.67%/yr for SRVR. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. REK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
REK vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REK achieves a -10.66% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 6.87% return.
REK
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- -10.66%
- 1Y
- -6.85%
- 3Y*
- -3.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- -5.95%
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- -4.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
REK vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REK ProShares Short Real Estate | -10.66% | 2.35% | 1.42% | -6.61% | 29.17% | -30.58% | -11.33% | -20.96% | -0.90% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 6.87% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between REK and SRVR is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | -0.80 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between REK and SRVR has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.80 to -0.56, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REK vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
REK
SRVR
REK vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REK | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.97 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.30 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -0.60 | -0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REK vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REK drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, which is greater than SRVR's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REK and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REK | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.57% | -40.99% | -43.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -14.98% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.93% | -18.34% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.93% | -40.99% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.74% | -21.75% | -60.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -15.27% | -48.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 7.55% | -2.03% |
Volatility
REK vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) at 4.22%. This indicates that REK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REK | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 4.22% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 14.02% | -2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 17.29% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 19.85% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 21.41% | -1.05% |
REK vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
REK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
REK vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
REK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than SRVR's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REK ProShares Short Real Estate | 3.32% | 3.43% | 6.22% | 4.50% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 1.28% | 0.43% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.86% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REK and SRVR have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REK has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to SRVR (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REK dropped -84.57% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, REK leads with -0.24% vs -3.67% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, REK has performed better with a -0.24% return vs -3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REK.
REK has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.86% for SRVR.
REK tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%), while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REK and 0.49% for SRVR.
SRVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REK and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer