PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REK vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REK vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REK achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.


REK

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.33%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-5.51%
1Y
-2.96%
3Y*
-3.69%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
-6.20%

SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REK vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
REK
ProShares Short Real Estate
-6.58%2.35%1.42%-6.61%29.17%-30.58%-11.33%-20.96%-1.31%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
19.79%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between REK and SRVR is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

-0.81

The correlation between REK and SRVR shifts across timeframes, from -0.83 (5 years) to -0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REK vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REK
SRVR

Financial Services

46.7%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

11.7%

Real Estate

-

66.4%

Technology

-

6.8%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Financial Services

REK
46.7%
SRVR
0.9%

Basic Materials

REK

-

SRVR
0.8%

Communication Services

REK

-

SRVR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

REK

-

SRVR

-

Consumer Defensive

REK

-

SRVR

-

Energy

REK

-

SRVR
3.8%

Healthcare

REK

-

SRVR

-

Industrials

REK

-

SRVR
11.7%

Real Estate

REK

-

SRVR
66.4%

Technology

REK

-

SRVR
6.8%

Utilities

REK

-

SRVR
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REK vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REK
REK Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
REK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REK Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
REK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
REK Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
REK Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REK vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REKSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.13

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

0.76

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

1.64

-2.31

REK vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REK Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REK and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REKSRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

0.67

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.04

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

0.30

-0.79

Drawdowns

REK vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REK drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, which is greater than SRVR's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REK and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REKSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.57%

-40.99%

-43.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-14.78%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.93%

-18.34%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.93%

-40.99%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.95%

-12.28%

-69.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.08%

-15.27%

-48.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

6.83%

-2.41%

Volatility

REK vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) is 3.91%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that REK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REKSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

5.47%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

13.12%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

16.72%

-3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

19.71%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

21.44%

-1.14%

REK vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

REK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

REK vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

REK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than SRVR's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
REK
ProShares Short Real Estate
3.27%3.43%6.22%4.50%0.48%0.00%0.07%1.28%0.43%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


REK and SRVR have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to REK (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REK dropped -84.57% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, REK leads with -0.14% vs -0.81% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, REK has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, REK has performed better with a -0.14% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REK.

REK has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.70% for SRVR.

REK tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%), while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REK and 0.60% for SRVR.

SRVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REK and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer