PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REIPX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REIPX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I (REIPX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REIPX achieves a 17.35% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, REIPX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 12.08%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.47% annualized return.


REIPX

1D
0.67%
1M
1.19%
6M
13.13%
YTD
17.35%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
12.08%
ALL TIME*
12.49%

TRLGX

1D
2.28%
1M
-1.09%
6M
3.17%
YTD
0.26%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
17.47%
ALL TIME*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

REIPX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REIPX
T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I
17.35%14.74%11.96%9.84%-3.09%25.70%1.40%33.77%-9.20%15.57%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
0.26%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between REIPX and TRLGX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.61

The correlation between REIPX and TRLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REIPX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REIPX
REIPX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
REIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
REIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
REIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
REIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REIPX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I (REIPX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REIPXTRLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.08

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

0.39

+3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

1.15

+12.66

REIPX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REIPX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REIPX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REIPX drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIPX and TRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REIPXTRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.69%

-55.56%

+15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-18.18%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-21.17%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-40.44%

+22.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-40.44%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-5.48%

+5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-8.65%

+4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

6.08%

-4.15%

Volatility

REIPX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I (REIPX) is 2.99%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that REIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REIPXTRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

5.12%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

14.09%

-5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

17.23%

-6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

22.57%

-7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

21.80%

-4.05%

REIPX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REIPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

REIPX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

REIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than TRLGX's 13.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REIPX
T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I
2.36%2.87%9.05%6.30%6.86%8.89%3.65%12.62%11.53%9.03%7.88%0.00%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
13.66%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


REIPX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLGX has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to REIPX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REIPX dropped -39.69% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

REIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REIPX and TRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer