PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REIPX vs. FIKMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REIPX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I (REIPX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REIPX achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than FIKMX's 3.60% return.


REIPX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.91%
YTD
11.94%
6M
13.96%
1Y
23.54%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
11.87%

FIKMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
3.60%
6M
4.00%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REIPX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
REIPX
T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I
11.94%14.74%11.96%9.84%-3.09%25.70%1.40%33.77%-10.12%
FIKMX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z
3.60%7.29%8.03%9.51%-14.48%19.04%-0.98%18.04%-1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between REIPX and FIKMX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.63

The correlation between REIPX and FIKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REIPX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REIPX
REIPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
REIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
REIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
REIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
REIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKMX
FIKMX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FIKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REIPX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I (REIPX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REIPXFIKMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.42

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

10.52

+1.86

REIPX vs. FIKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FIKMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REIPX and FIKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REIPXFIKMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.05

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.58

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.55

+0.14

Drawdowns

REIPX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REIPX drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIPX and FIKMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REIPXFIKMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.69%

-34.49%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-3.43%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-7.16%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-18.04%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.48%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-5.15%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.79%

+1.16%

Volatility

REIPX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I (REIPX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.20%. This indicates that REIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REIPXFIKMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

1.20%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

3.10%

+4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.65%

4.04%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

6.48%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

10.59%

+7.25%

REIPX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REIPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

REIPX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison

REIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than FIKMX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIKMX
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z
4.67%4.80%4.81%5.15%6.24%1.59%4.90%5.82%2.31%0.00%0.00%
REIPX
T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Class I
2.54%2.87%9.05%6.30%6.86%8.89%3.65%12.62%11.53%9.03%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


REIPX and FIKMX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REIPX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to FIKMX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REIPX dropped -39.69% vs FIKMX's -34.49%.

REIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REIPX and FIKMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer