PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

REI-UN.TO (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust) is a stock, while XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) is Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 5 years, REI-UN.TO returned 6.28%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for XEQT.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REI-UN.TO achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than XEQT.TO's 13.22% return.

REI-UN.TO

1D
0.73%
1M
2.53%
YTD
21.09%
6M
24.11%
1Y
36.66%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
3.70%

XEQT.TO

1D
0.83%
1M
6.02%
YTD
13.22%
6M
11.68%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
REI-UN.TO
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust		21.09%9.00%4.33%-6.86%-3.42%43.34%-31.78%3.94%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		13.22%19.47%24.36%17.25%-11.01%18.94%11.82%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between REI-UN.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019

0.45

The correlation between REI-UN.TO and XEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with REI-UN.TO:
REI-UN.TO vs. SRU-UN.TOREI-UN.TO vs. CRT-UN.TOREI-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TOREI-UN.TO vs. FCR-UN.TOREI-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TOREI-UN.TO vs. BAM.TOREI-UN.TO vs. VDY.TO
Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
REI-UN.TO
REI-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
REI-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REI-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
REI-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
REI-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REI-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

REI-UN.TOXEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.54
2.62

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.62
3.61

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.48

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.93

3.70

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.05

16.13

-0.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REI-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REI-UN.TO and XEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

REI-UN.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.62

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

1.07

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.72

0.96

-1.68

Drawdowns

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REI-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REI-UN.TO and XEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

REI-UN.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-29.74%

-70.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.21%

-8.25%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-15.08%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-19.56%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.93%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.91%

0.00%

-99.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.00%

-4.11%

-88.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.89%

+0.40%

Volatility

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 3.70%. This indicates that REI-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

REI-UN.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

3.70%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

9.41%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

11.65%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

13.13%

+5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.98%

15.56%

+6.42%

Dividends

REI-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

REI-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.47% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REI-UN.TO
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust		5.24%6.17%6.06%5.77%4.80%4.18%8.60%5.38%6.05%5.79%5.29%5.95%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.47%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

REI-UN.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REI-UN.TO and XEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer