PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

REGB.L is traded in GBP, while XSLE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XSLE.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than XSLE.DE's -27.13% return.


REGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-15.09%
YTD
16.69%
6M
15.50%
1Y
118.12%
3Y*
0.07%
5Y*
10Y*

XSLE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-24.53%
YTD
-27.13%
6M
-27.13%
1Y
53.82%
3Y*
31.40%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
16.69%75.67%-34.55%-22.78%-22.89%-20.32%
XSLE.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities
-27.13%162.25%14.91%-6.76%5.78%-1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between REGB.L and XSLE.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.35

The correlation between REGB.L and XSLE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGB.L
REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XSLE.DE
XSLE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XSLE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGB.LXSLE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.67

1.06

+4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.51

2.38

+11.13

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the XSLE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGB.L and XSLE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, which is greater than XSLE.DE's maximum drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and XSLE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGB.LXSLE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.24%

-50.63%

-23.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.93%

-50.63%

+29.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.57%

-50.63%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.34%

-50.63%

+14.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.84%

-21.00%

-23.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.78%

22.58%

-13.80%

Volatility

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) is 13.32%, while Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that REGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSLE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGB.LXSLE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.32%

15.37%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.12%

54.86%

-21.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.36%

58.26%

-11.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.34%

35.60%

+10.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.34%

35.59%

+10.75%

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than XSLE.DE's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGB.L vs. XSLE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither REGB.L nor XSLE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


REGB.L and XSLE.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, REGB.L is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

REGB.L is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for XSLE.DE.

REGB.L is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while XSLE.DE is Silver. REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while XSLE.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REGB.L and 0.73% for XSLE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGB.L and XSLE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer