REGB.L vs. WDGF

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF).

REGB.L and WDGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021. WDGF is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global Defense Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2025. Both REGB.L and WDGF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

REGB.L vs. WDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

REGB.L is traded in GBP, while WDGF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WDGF values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 21.06% return, which is significantly higher than WDGF's 13.66% return.

REGB.L

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -7.78%
• YTD: 21.06%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 133.55%
• 3Y*: 0.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WDGF

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 13.66%
• 6M: 6.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGB.L vs. WDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	21.06%	28.21%
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund	13.66%	0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between REGB.L and WDGF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.

REGB.L vs. WDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than WDGF's 0.45% expense ratio.

REGB.L

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A

WDGF

WisdomTree Global Defense Fund

Return for Risk

REGB.L vs. WDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGB.L

REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGB.L vs. WDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REGB.L	WDGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.38	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.80	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REGB.L	WDGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	1.30	-1.33

Drawdowns

REGB.L vs. WDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, which is greater than WDGF's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and WDGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	REGB.L	WDGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.41%	-13.29%	-59.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.28%	-5.56%	-23.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.80%	-4.48%	-36.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	REGB.L	WDGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.15%	20.94%	+23.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.78%	20.94%	+23.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.78%	20.94%	+23.84%

Dividends

REGB.L vs. WDGF - Dividend Comparison

REGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

	TTM	2025
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund	0.04%	0.05%