REGB.L vs. STTK
REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while STTK (Shattuck Labs, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, REGB.L returned 0.07%/yr vs 28.73%/yr for STTK. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
REGB.L vs. STTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
REGB.L is traded in GBP, while STTK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the STTK values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly lower than STTK's 93.48% return.
REGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.09%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 118.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STTK
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 18.53%
- YTD
- 93.48%
- 6M
- 96.09%
- 1Y
- 808.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.73%
- 5Y*
- -24.26%
- 10Y*
- —
REGB.L vs. STTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 16.69% | 75.67% | -34.55% | -22.78% | -22.89% | -20.32% |
STTK Shattuck Labs, Inc. | 93.48% | 180.16% | -82.73% | 194.51% | -69.76% | -53.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGB.L and STTK is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGB.L vs. STTK — Risk / Return Rank
REGB.L
STTK
REGB.L vs. STTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REGB.L | STTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.64 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 16.40 | -10.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 49.09 | -35.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGB.L vs. STTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, smaller than the maximum STTK drawdown of -98.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and STTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGB.L | STTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.24% | -98.71% | +24.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -49.79% | +28.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.57% | -93.82% | +33.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.34% | -87.68% | +51.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.84% | -83.01% | +38.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 16.61% | -7.83% |
Volatility
REGB.L vs. STTK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) is 13.32%, while Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) has a volatility of 38.06%. This indicates that REGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGB.L | STTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.32% | 38.06% | -24.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.12% | 58.41% | -25.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 101.92% | -55.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 117.83% | -71.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 114.33% | -67.99% |
Dividends
REGB.L vs. STTK - Dividend Comparison
Neither REGB.L nor STTK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
REGB.L and STTK have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for REGB.L and STTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer